The
word ‘civilization’ stands for the process by which a
society or place reaches this stage. Alternatively it may mean; the
most advanced stage of human social development and organization. The
first definition seems more accurate than the latter one. Each
country has a specific history and landscape which determined their
present state. But if human race was just a product of their
environment and the things that happened to them, it wouldn’t be
any better than animals. There is something as important as a
nation’s history and environment which is known as ‘the human
will’. A country’s fate is as much determined by the state of its
citizens, their character and their will power, as it is by a number
of other factors. This is what differentiates one country’s
progress from another’s.
I often wonder the significance of the word ‘civilisation’ in relation to our country. There is no dearth of people boasting the’ greatness’ of Indian civilisation and its heritage. The things people do in name of culture and honour would send shivers down any mortal’s spine. The way people treat their fellow citizens would leave you wondering if you are living among group of refugees forcibly made to live together in a country where being rude, uncivil, uncouth, arrogant and condescending towards other people seems for most people to lay their claim on the country. Perhaps in their minds it’s their moral duty to harass other people just to ensure themselves of their legitimate citizenship status. And such collective behaviour leads to a certain attribution of meaning to the term ‘Indian’.
A group is made of individuals and even the largest country in the world ,in terms of population, is a collective presence of a certain number of ‘individuals’ on a certain land mass ,which is more than the number of people of other land masses . Indian society is collectivistic and promotes interdependence. The traditional Indian joint family, which followed the principles of collectivism, is rapidly being replaced by the nuclear family system. Individualism, on the other hand, promotes the habit of being independent and self reliant. Individuals advocate that interests of the individual should be given precedence over the state or a social group, while opposing external interference upon one's own interests by society or institutions such as the government. Indian society is at crossroads and unless the people collectively decide to dictate their collective fate, it will remain in the same condition for a very long time. As the society is passing through a transition period, perhaps of the kind never witnessed before, it is natural that there will be chaos, conflict, tumult and what not. In such a time the old structures are being uprooted and the new ones have not completely been formed or replaced the old ones yet. In such a flux, it is nearly impossible for a person to relate to his/her surroundings, as the world he/she knows keeps changing every year. This results in a very confused sense of self and could be a reason why people treat other people with contempt.
I often wonder the significance of the word ‘civilisation’ in relation to our country. There is no dearth of people boasting the’ greatness’ of Indian civilisation and its heritage. The things people do in name of culture and honour would send shivers down any mortal’s spine. The way people treat their fellow citizens would leave you wondering if you are living among group of refugees forcibly made to live together in a country where being rude, uncivil, uncouth, arrogant and condescending towards other people seems for most people to lay their claim on the country. Perhaps in their minds it’s their moral duty to harass other people just to ensure themselves of their legitimate citizenship status. And such collective behaviour leads to a certain attribution of meaning to the term ‘Indian’.
A group is made of individuals and even the largest country in the world ,in terms of population, is a collective presence of a certain number of ‘individuals’ on a certain land mass ,which is more than the number of people of other land masses . Indian society is collectivistic and promotes interdependence. The traditional Indian joint family, which followed the principles of collectivism, is rapidly being replaced by the nuclear family system. Individualism, on the other hand, promotes the habit of being independent and self reliant. Individuals advocate that interests of the individual should be given precedence over the state or a social group, while opposing external interference upon one's own interests by society or institutions such as the government. Indian society is at crossroads and unless the people collectively decide to dictate their collective fate, it will remain in the same condition for a very long time. As the society is passing through a transition period, perhaps of the kind never witnessed before, it is natural that there will be chaos, conflict, tumult and what not. In such a time the old structures are being uprooted and the new ones have not completely been formed or replaced the old ones yet. In such a flux, it is nearly impossible for a person to relate to his/her surroundings, as the world he/she knows keeps changing every year. This results in a very confused sense of self and could be a reason why people treat other people with contempt.
The proponents of
collectivist school of thought blame the rise of individualistic
approach for this phenomenon. It is often said that people
today are so driven towards their personal
goals that civic sense as an ethic has
become a low priority, almost a nuisance. And this attitude
is prevalent across all sections of society.
Separatism, vandalism, intolerance, racism, road rage etc. are all
examples of lack of civic sense. People are becoming less and less
tolerant of each other, of other's cultures, backgrounds, and other
similar traits. But to blame individualism is going a bit too
far.Individualism holds that a civilized society, or any
form of association, cooperation or peaceful coexistence among men,
can be achieved only on the basis of the recognition of individual
rights—and that a group, as such, has no rights other than the
individual rights of its members. An individualist recognizes the
inalienable individual rights of man—his own and those of others
opposed to what collectivists think it means. Anyone who claims to
believe in doing anything at others expense and claims himself to be
an individualist perhaps doesn’t understand what the term stands
for. An individualist doesn’t want to be a master nor a slave. So,
to blame individualism for the inconsiderate behaviour of people
towards others is not acceptable. The proponents of collectivist
school of thought must be told that it is known as crude selfishness
not individualism.
The current state of
roads, public transport, cleanliness and public infrastructure is
disheartening. It
is easy to blame government, but people must first question
themselves and their own civic sense. Why don’t people question
their own behaviour? While driving they turn into savages with no
regard for pedestrians or other fellow motorists. In public transport
pushing and shoving is a given. This callous attitude is behind a lot
of problems that afflict the country. Looking down upon your own
country is perhaps a reflection of hatred for your own self and kith
and kin. Do not be mistaken and think that you’re above others.
What goes around comes around.
So the next time one boasts the greatness of our civilization, it wouldn't be inappropriate to ponder the validity of such a claim in the present context i.e. where does the greatness lie ? In the ancient books or in emulating those values ?
So the next time one boasts the greatness of our civilization, it wouldn't be inappropriate to ponder the validity of such a claim in the present context i.e. where does the greatness lie ? In the ancient books or in emulating those values ?
No comments:
Post a Comment